Minnesota Department of Transportation
Jump to main content.
Minnesota Department of Transportation Go to 511
MnDOT A to Z | General Contacts | Simple Search | Advanced Search
Survey Implementation Model Map Cross-section
 

Mn/Model

Final Report Phases 1-3 (2002)

Contact Us   Mn/Model Home | Archaeology | Geomorphology | Geographic Information Systems (GIS) | Implementation

 

Quick Links

Chapters

Appendices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

List of Tables

 

Table 3.1          Climatic Episodes in the Early, Middle, and Late Holocene

Table 3.2          Ecological Classifications System Organization

Table 3.3          Distinctions Between ECS Provinces

Table 3.4          Distinctions Between Sections of the Laurentian Mixed Forest Province

Table 3.5          Distinctions Between Subsections of the Northern Minnesota Drift & Lake Plains Section

 

Table 4.1          GIS Data Sources

Table 4.2          Relationship Between Map Scale and the Minimum Mapping Unit

Table 4.3          Values for Variables in Phase 2 Data Confidence Model

Table 4.4          Raw Values of Three Data Quality Variables in Phase 3 Data Confidence Model, by ECS Subsection

Table 4.5          Normalized Values for Elevation Quality and Data Resolution Variables in Phase 3 Data Confidence Model

Table 4.6          Weights Assigned to Variables in Phase 3 Data Confidence Model

Table 4.7          Comparison of Mn/Model Study Area Size with that of Selected Previous Predictive Models

Table 4.8          Archaeological Subregions and Subregion Groups Modeled in Phase 2

 

Table 5.1          Summary Statistics for Seven Counties Surveyed for the MnSAS and Mn/Model

Table 5.2          Summary Statistics for the Comparison of Site Occurrences Between Mn/Model and the MnSAS.

Table 5.3          Summary Site Occurrence Statistics for Six Counties Surveyed for Mn/Model

Table 5.4          Cross Tabulation of Frequencies of Landform Type and Survey Coverage for the 1996 Mn/Model Field Survey of Wright County

Table 5.5          Summary of Information Included in the Mn/Model Archaeological Database

Table 5.5a        Summary of Information Included in the Phase 3 Mn/Model Archaeological Database

Table 5.5b        Sites in the Mn/Model Database that are Erroneously Coded as Negative Surveys

Table 5.6          Mn/Model Survey Report Inclusion Criteria

 

Table 6.1          Environmental Variables Used in Phase 2 and 3 Modeling

Table 6.2          Counties with High Resolution Digital Soil Surveys Available in Phase 2

Table 6.3          River Valleys and Upland Landforms Mapped

 

Table 7.1          Evaluation of Phase 1 Initial Models: % Known Sites (Excluding Single Artifacts) in Each Site Probability Class

Table 7.2          Evaluation of Initial Basic Models: % of Test Population Sites in Each Phase 1 Site Potential Class

Table 7.3          Association of Known Archaeological Sites with Slope

Table 7.4          Approximate Correspondence Between Degrees Slope and Percent Slope

Table 7.5          Distribution of Water, Steep Slope, and Mines in Phase 2 Regions

Table 7.6          Best Phase 2 Site Probability Model (Excluding Single Artifacts)

Table 7.7          Hypothetical Distribution of Site Probability Model among 20 Site Potential Classes

Table 7.8          Evaluation of Site Probability Model Agreement, Anoka Sand Plain Subsection

Table 7.9          Reclassification of Co-occurring Site and Survey Probability Model Values for Survey Implementation Models

 

Table 8.5.1       List of Model Subsections Arranged by the Number of Hydrologic Variables

Table 8.5.2       Model Variables Arranged According to Subsection and Subsection Groups

Table 8.5.3       Summary of the Results of the Analysis of Cultural Context and Site Type Variables by Subsection

Table 8.5.4       Summary Statistics for Modeled Sites and Random Points by Subsection for the Variable Distance to Nearest Lake, Wetland, Organic Soil, or Stream

Table 8.6.1       Evaluation of Basic Models, Percent Known Sites (Excluding Single Artifacts) in Each Site Potential Class

Table 8.6.2       Best Phase 2 Basic Models (Excluding Single Artifacts)

Table 8.6.3       Best Phase 2 Basic Models (Excluding Single Artifacts and Lithic Scatters)

Table 8.6.4       Comparison of Phase 2 Models with and without Lithic Scatters

Table 8.6.5       Evaluation of Best Phase 1 Model vs. Best Phase 2 Model (Excluding Single Artifacts)

Table 8.6.6       Performance of all Phase 2 Basic Variables in 30 Model Runs: Number of Models Each Variable had Probability Greater than Zero, Maximum Probability Recorded, Cumulative Probability

Table 8.6.7       Performance of all Trygg Variables in 18 Phase 2 Model Runs: Number of Models Each Variable had Probability Greater than Zero, Maximum Probability Recorded, Cumulative Probability

Table 8.6.8       Performance of all High Resolution Soils Variables in 14 Phase 2 Model Runs: Number of Models Each Variable had Probability Greater than Zero, Maximum Probability Recorded, Cumulative Probability

Table 8.6.9       Raw Model Values for Models Excluding Single Artifacts

Table 8.6.10     Raw Model Values for Models Excluding Single Artifacts and Lithic Scatters

Table 8.6.11     Site Probability Model Performance for all 20 Regions Modeled in Phase 3

Table 8.6.12     Comparison of Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 Site Probability Models

Table 8.6.13     Performance of all Phase 3 Variables in the Best Site Probability Models: Number of Models Each Variable had Probability Greater than Zero, Maximum Probability Recorded, Cumulative Probability

Table 8.6.14     Survey Probability Model Performance for all 20 Regions Modeled in Phase 3

Table 8.6.15     Performance of all Phase 3 Variables in the Best Survey Probability Models: Number of Models Each Variable had Probability Greater that Zero, Maximum Probability Recorded, Cumulative Probability

Table 8.6.16     Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model for all 20 Regions Modeled in Phase 3

Table 8.6.17     Evaluation of Site Potential Outside the Unknown Zone

Table 8.6.18     Site Probability Model from Statewide Database

Table 8.6.19     Evaluation of Site Probability Model from Statewide Database

 

Agassiz Lowlands

Table 8.7.1       Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Mode

Table 8.7.2       Combined Site Probability Model

Table 8.7.3       Evaluation of Agassiz Lowlands Portion of Combined Site Probability Model

Table 8.7.4       Conditional Kappa Values for the Agassiz Lowlands Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.7.5       Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.7.6       Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.7.7       Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.7.8       Evaluation of Agassiz Lowlands Portion of Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.7.9       Conditional Kappa Values for the Individual Survey Probability Model

Table 8.7.10     Conditional Kappa Values for the Agassiz Lowlands Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.7.11     Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Anoka Sand Plain

Table 8.8.1       Site Probability Model

Table 8.8.2       Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.8.3       Conditional Kappa Values

Table 8.8.4       Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.8.5       Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.8.6       Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.8.7       Survey Probability Model

Table 8.8.8       Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.8.9       Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.8.10     Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Aspen Parklands

Table 8.9.1       Site Probability Model

Table 8.9.2       Evaluation of Aspen Parklands Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.9.3       Evaluation of Aspen Parklands Portion of the Reclassified Site Probability Model

Table 8.9.4       Conditional Kappa Values of Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.9.5       Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.9.6       Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.9.7       Survey Probability Model

Table 8.9.8       Evaluation of Aspen Parklands Portion of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.9.9       Conditional Kappa Values for the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.9.10     Evaluation of Portion of Survey Implementation Model

 

Big Woods

Table 8.10.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.10.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.10.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.10.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.10.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.10.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.10.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.10.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.10.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.10.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Blufflands

Table 8.11.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.11.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.11.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.11.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.11.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.11.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.11.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.11.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.11.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.11.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Border Lakes

Table 8.12.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.12.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.12.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.12.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.12.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.12.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.12.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.12.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.12.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.12.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Chippewa Plains

Table 8.13.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.13.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.13.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.13.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.13.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.13.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.13.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.13.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.13.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.13.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Coteau Moraines and Inner Coteau Subsections of North Central Glaciated Plains Section

Table 8.14.1     Site Probability Model, Inner Coteau and Coteau Moraines Subsections

Table 8.14.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.14.3     Conditional Kappa Values of Site Probability Model

Table 8.14.4     Evaluation of Coteau Moraines Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.14.5     Conditional Kappa Values for the Coteau Moraines Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.14.6     Evaluation of Inner Coteau Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.14.7     Conditional Kappa Values for Inner Coteau Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.14.8     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.14.9     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.14.10   Summary of Bivariate Relationships Between Nine Dichotomous Archaeological Variables and Three Areas of Site Potential

Table 8.14.11   Survey Probability Model

Table 8.14.12   Evaluation of Survey Probability Model, Inner Coteau and Coteau Moraines Subsections

Table 8.14.13   Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model, Inner Coteau and Coteau Moraines Subsections

Table 8.14.14   Evaluation of the Coteau Moraines Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.14.15   Conditional Kappa Values for the Coteau Moraines Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.14.16   Evaluation of the Inner Coteau Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.14.17   Conditioinal Kappa Values for the Inner Coteau Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.14.18   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Glacial Lake Superior Plain / North Shore Highlands / Nashwauk Uplands

Table 8.15.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.4     Evaluation of Glacial Lake Superior Plain Potion of Combined Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.5     Conditional Kappa Values for Glacial Lake Superior Plain Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.6     Evaluation of North Shore Highlands Portion of Combined Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.7     Conditional Kappa Values for North Shore Highlands Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.8     Evaluation of Nashwauk Uplands Portion of Combined Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Nashwauk Uplands Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.15.10   Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.15.11   Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.15.12   Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.13   Evaluation of Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.14   Conditional Kappa Values of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.15   Evaluation of Glacial Lake Superior Plain Portion of Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.16   Conditional Kappa Values of the Glacial Lake Superior Plain Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.17   Evaluation of North Shore Highlands Portion of Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.18   Conditional Kappa Values of the North Shore Highlands Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.19   Evaluation of Nashwauk Uplands Portion of Combined Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.20   Conditional Kappa Values of the Nashwauk Uplands Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.15.21   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Hardwood Hills

Table 8.16.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.16.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.16.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.16.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.16.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.16.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.16.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.16.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.16.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.16.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Laurentian Highlands

Table 8.17.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.17.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.17.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.17.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.17.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.17.6     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.17.7     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.17.8     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.17.9     Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Littlefork-Vermilion Uplands

Table 8.18.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.18.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.18.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.18.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.18.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.18.6     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.18.7     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.18.8     Conditional Kappa Values for Portion of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.18.9     Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Mille Lacs Uplands

Table 8.19.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.19.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.19.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.19.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.19.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.19.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.19.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.19.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.19.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.19.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Minnesota River Prairie

Table 8.20.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.20.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.20.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.20.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.20.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.20.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.20.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.20.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.20.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.20.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Oak Savanna

Table 8.21.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.21.2     Evaluation of the Oak Savanna Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.21.3     Conditional Kappa Values for the Oak Savanna Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.21.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.21.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.21.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.21.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.21.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.21.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.21.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Pine Moraines & Outwash Plains

Table 8.22.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.22.2     Evaluation of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.22.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.22.4     Model Variable Statistics 

Table 8.22.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.22.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships 

Table 8.22.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.22.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model 

Table 8.22.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.22.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Red River Prairie

Table 8.23.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.23.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.23.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.23.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.23.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.23.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.23.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.23.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.23.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.23.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

Rochester Plateau

Table 8.24.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.24.2     Evaluation of Rochester Plateau Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.24.3     Conditional Kappa Values of Portion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.24.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.24.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.24.6     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.24.7     Evaluation of Portion of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.24.8     Conditional Kappa Values for Portion of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.24.9     Evaluation of Portion of Survey Implementation Model

 

St. Croix Moraines & Outwash Plains

Table 8.25.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.25.2     Evaluation of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.25.3     Conditional Kappa Values of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.25.4     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.25.5     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.25.6     Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.25.7     Survey Probability Model

Table 8.25.8     Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.25.9     Conditional Kappa Values for Survey Probability Model

Table 8.25.10   Evaluation of Survey Implementation Model

 

St. Louis Moraines and Tamarack Lowlands

Table 8.26.1     Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.2     Evaluation of Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.3     Conditional Kappa Values for Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.4     Evaluation of St. Louis Moraines Potion of Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.5     Conditional Kappa Values for St. Louis Moraines Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.6     Evaluation of Tamarack Lowlands Portion of Combined Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.7     Conditional Kappa Values for Tamarack Lowlands Portion of the Site Probability Model

Table 8.26.8     Model Variable Statistics

Table 8.26.9     Variable Correlation Matrix

Table 8.26.10   Summary of Bivariate Relationships

Table 8.26.11   Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.12   Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.13   Conditional Kappa Values of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.14   Evaluation of St. Louis Moraines Portion of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.15   Conditional Kappa Values of the St. Louis Moraines Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.16   Evaluation of Tamarack Lowlands Portion of Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.17   Conditional Kappa Values of the Tamarack Lowlands Portion of the Survey Probability Model

Table 8.26.18   Evaluation of Survey Probability Model

 

Table 9.1          Cross-Tabulation of the Number of Hectares in the Three Site Probability Areas Based on Mn/Model and the Intuitive Model

 

Table 10.1        Limitations of Data Sources

 

Table 11.1        Environmental and Cultural Data Layers Assembled to Construct the Models

 

Table 12.1        Map Unit Code Key for Mn/Model v.4.6

Table 12.2        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Minnesota River

Table 12.3        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Mississippi River

Table 12.4        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Rainy River

Table 12.5        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Red Lake Bog

Table 12.6        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Red River

Table 12.7        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Rock River

Table 12.8        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - Root River

Table 12.9        Manual of Landform-Sediment Assemblages - St. Croix River

Table 12.10      Landscape Suitability Rankings (LSR) and Landform - Sediment Assemblages for the Anoka Sand Plains

Table 12.11      Landscape Suitability Rankings (LSR) and Landform - Sediment Assemblages for the Bemidji Uplands

Table 12.12      Landscape Suitability Rankings (LSR) and Landform - Sediment Assemblages for the Glacial Lake Agassiz

Table 12.13      Landscape Suitability Rankings (LSR) and Landform - Sediment Assemblages for the Lake Benton Uplands

Table 12.14      Landscape Suitability Rankings (LSR) and Landform - Sediment Assemblages for the Mountain Lake Uplands

Table 12.15      Landscape Suitability Rankings (LSR) and Landform - Sediment Assemblages for the Nicollet Uplands

 

Table B.1          FIPS Codes for Minnesota Counties

Table B.2          Scales and Formats of Mapped Bedrock Geology

Table B.3          Bedrock Groups or Formation of Interest for Mn/Model

Table B.4          Counties with County Soil Survey Data from EPPL7 Sources, Phase 2

Table B.5          Archaeological Regions of Minnesota

Table B.6          Counties within Each Archaeological Region in Minnesota

Table B.7          Counties in Phase 3 Modeling Regions and ECS Subsections

Table B.8          Attributes of ARCHDATA

Table B.9          Differences in Elevation between Digital Data Sources and USGS 7.5' quadrangle maps

Table B.10        Differences between 1:24,000 Digital Data Sources and 1:250,000 MGC100 Data

Table B.11        Assignment of Values to General Water Regime. National Wetlands Inventory

Table B.12        Classification of Wetland Vegetation Types from NWI

Table B.13        Criteria for Assigning H20_TYPE from NWI

Table B.14        Criteria for Classifying Water Body Regime from NWI

Table B.15        Criteria for Classifying Wetlands for NWI_WET Grid

Table B.16        Criteria for Classifying H20 for Creation of LAKE1 Grid

Table B.17        Criteria for Classifying Wetlands for WET1 Grid

Table B.18        Reservoir Lakes Modified for Modeling

Table B.19        Values for DEPTH30

Table B.20        Values for GEOM30  

Table B.21        Values for LFORM30

Table B.22        Values for QUAT30

Table B.23        Bedrock Group Coding for Mn/Model

Table B.24        Values for DRAIN30 Grid

Table B.25        Soil Texture Classes

Table B.26        Map Unit Names with No Textural Class Given in NRCS Database, and the Texture Classes Assigned to Them

Table B.27        Texture Class Reassignments for all Records Initially Classified as VAR

Table B.28        Suitability of Soil Texture Classes for Archaeological Sites

Table B.29        Mean Values of Numeric Variables for Textural Classes, Added to Records with NODATA for these Variables.

Table B.30        Mean Values of AvClay for Textural Classes, Added to Records with NODATA for this Variable

Table B.31        Mean Values of AvAWC for Textural Classes, Added to Records with NODATA for this Variable

Table B.32        Mean Values of AvOM for Textural Classes, Added to Records with NODATA for this Variable

Table B.33        Mean Values of AvPh for Textural Classes, Added to Records with NODATA for this Variable

Table B.34        Attributes of SOILS Grid

Table B.35        Values for M_VEG Grid

Table B.36        Attributes of Values for T_VEG Coverage and Correspondence to Symbols on Source Maps

Table B.37        Attributes for T_CULT Coverage

Table B.38        Attributes Values for T_RDS Coverage and Correspondence to Symbols on Source Maps

Table B.39        Attributes of TR_CLAIM Coverage

Table B.40       Environmental Variables Used in Mn/Model

Table B.41       Values Used for Solar Altitude (SA) in each Archaeological Region

Table B.42       Variables Transformed for Phase 3 Modeling

Table B.43       Model Input Form for Logistic Regression in S-Plus

Table B.44       Model Results Form for Logistic Regression in S-Plus

Table B.45       Variables of Model Grids in Phase 3

Table B.46       Phase 2 Model Classification Form

Table B.47       Phase 2 Worksheet for Model Classificiation

Table B.48       Reclassification Table for Deriving Final Probability Models

Table B.49       Phase 3 Model Classification Form

Table B.50       Phase 1 Model Evaluation Form

Table B.51       Phase 3 Model Evaluation Form

Table B.52       RMS-error, Chi-Square, and P-values for Phase 3 Models

Table B.53       Lowest Resolution Database in Phase 3 Site Probability Models by Subsections

Table B.54       Number of Sites in Modeled Population

Table B.55       Impact of Errors in ARCHDATA.PAT on Models

Table B.56       Results of Logistic Regression in GRID

 

Table C.1         Stratification Outline

 

Table D.1         Becker County Cultural Material

Table D.2         Beltrami County Cultural Material

Table D.3         Nicollet County Cultural Material

Table D.4         Stearns County Cultural Material

Table D.5         Cass County Surveyed Random Points

Table D.6         Cass County Non-Surveyed Random Points

Table D.7         Cass County Cultural Material

Table D.8         Wabasha County Surveyed Random Points

Table D.9         Wabasha County Non-Surveyed Random Points

Table D.10       Wabasha County Cultural Material

Table D.11       Wright County Surveyed Random Points

Table D.12       Wright County Non-Surveyed Random Points

Table D.13       Wright County Cultural Material

 

Table E.1         Master List of Sampled Organics and Identifications

Table E.2         Master List of Mn/Model Radiocarbon Dates

 

 

 

The Mn/Model Final Report (Phases 1-3) is available on CD-ROM. Copies may be requested by e-mail: mnmodel@state.mn.us

 

MnModel Orange Bar Logo

Acknowledgements

Mn/Model was financed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation using funds set aside by the Federal Highway Administration's Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act.

 

Copyright Notice

The Mn/Model process and the predictive models it produced are copyrighted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), 2000. They may not be used without MnDOT's Consent.