This webinar series can be used to train a new Safe Routes to School team and prepare for the Safe Routes planning process.
There is no wrong way to write a Safe Routes to School plan, but typically a plan will include the following:
For a Safe Routes to School Plan to be effective, it must be reviewed and updated on a regular basis. Plans should be reviewed on an annual basis, and major updates to the plan should take place on a 3-5 year basis. The person or team responsible for reviewing the plan should be identified in the implementation section. Also, as the plan is being written, think about metrics that can be used to evaluate its success, such as the number of walking or biking encouragement events held during the school year or the number of students that receive bicycle education in physical education classes. As plans are implemented, the goals and strategies in the plan should begin to be achieved, and new goals and strategies should be identified during the process of updating the plan.
Forming a Safe Routes to School team is a great way to get started with Safe Routes to School programs or planning. This tip sheet provides ways to get started.
A range of partners can help grow and sustain your program. The document Engaging Stakeholders in the Safe Routes to School Planning Process provides information to help local Safe Routes teams engage community members in a program or planning process.
A walk audit is a field visit to a school and the surrounding neighborhood to observe travel behavior and examine how people driving, walking, and biking interact with each other and the built environment. The purpose of walk audits is to document existing behavior and infrastructure and to identify safety conditions that need improvement. The walk audit tip sheet has info for getting started.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation developed the Hazard Observation tool to help communities evaluate and summarize current conditions that impact youth’s ability to walk and bicycle to school safely. Hazard Observations are strongly encouraged for all communities working on Safe Routes initiatives. To use the assessment tool, review the Safe Routes to School Hazard Observation Guide (PDF, 110 KB), and complete the worksheet, then complete the online survey to record and submit answers. Data from the assessments will be stored and tracked by MnDOT to develop a better understanding of statewide conditions that affect walking and bicycling to school.
In 2009, a Safe Routes to School Committee was established in Grand Marais and worked to create its first Safe Routes to School plan over the next year. The plan was created with participation from various agencies and community members in Cook County. Improved pedestrian safety measures along the Highway 61 corridor was identified as a top priority in the plan. In 2013, a Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN Center for Prevention funding source was secured for the Highway 61 corridor redesign project in Grand Marais, with the goal of creating a safer and more accessible corridor for people of all ages on foot and bike.
The project had an extensive community engagement process, including three public meetings, online input opportunities and review of videos of meetings and materials, and one-on-one meetings with businesses and property owners along the corridor and other targeted public meeting groups. After going through the robust community engagement process, Health Impact Assessment, and other supporting efforts, funding was secured through the Transportation Alternatives Program for the pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure portion of the project. This $600,000 of funding will help the project to be constructed in 2019, with additional support from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The local Safe Routes to School Committee is also working to address other top priority missing connections to school zones in Grand Marais.
The Southwest Regional Development Commission worked with the City of Lakefield to develop a Safe Routes to School Plan (June 2013) and Land Use Plan (June 2013). Both of these plans outlined projects to enable Lakefield to become more pedestrian friendly. The process entailed outlining sidewalk and trail gaps.
A key connection was missing between Pleasantview Elementary and the southern neighborhoods in Lakefield. The need for the trail project connecting the south city park and Pleasantview Elementary was discussed during the planning process for both plans.
The SRDC worked with Lakefield, Pleasantview Elementary (Jackson County Public Schools), and Jackson County Public Works to submit a Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant. The South Lakefield Connection Trail was selected for funding through the Minnesota Department of Transportation 2015-2016 Safe Routes to School solicitation. The success of this project was dependent on coordinated public planning processes that identified the gaps and potential solutions. This outlines how planning and plan development are key to securing funding for implementation.
Do you have a local success story to share? Submit a brief summary to email@example.com.